Legal Opinion
MacFarlane v. Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 2, 2002No. 01-7083Published
1Opinion of the Court
278 F.3d 54
Mary Ester MACFARLANE, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of D. Kenneth Macfarlane, Patrick Macfarlane, Scott Macfarlane, Christopher Macfarlane and Kelly Gill, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY as Successor in Interest to FKA Delaware and Hudson Railroad Co., Inc. and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 01-7083.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued November 13, 2001.
Decided January 2, 2002.
Kaveh S. Shahi, Rutland, VT (Cleary Shahi Associates, P.C.), for Plaintiffs-Appellants Mary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lane Capital Management, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Lane Capital Management, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc., Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Delaware & Hudson Co. v. NahasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Ludlam v. Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.