United States v. Mark Higgins, Thaddeus Harrison, and Orlando Potts
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Of three persons jointly indicted for cocaine offenses, one pleaded guilty and two were convicted by a jury. Mark Higgins, who pleaded guilty, instructed his lawyer to appeal; counsel filed an Anders brief. As counsel concluded, Higgins lacks plausible appellate contentions. The unconditional plea surrendered any objection to the court’s pretrial decisions; the judge followed Fed. R.Crim.P. 11 when taking the plea; and the judge was entitled to conclude that Higgins supervised at least one other person, leading to a two-level enhancement and a sentence of 121…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Deborah Walton and Kenneth MarsalisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Willsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Julius LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.