Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Higgins, Thaddeus Harrison, and Orlando Potts

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 7, 1996No. 95-1389, 95-1986 and 95-1987PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Of three persons jointly indicted for cocaine offenses, one pleaded guilty and two were convicted by a jury. Mark Higgins, who pleaded guilty, instructed his lawyer to appeal; counsel filed an Anders brief. As counsel concluded, Higgins lacks plausible appellate contentions. The unconditional plea surrendered any objection to the court’s pretrial decisions; the judge followed Fed. R.Crim.P. 11 when taking the plea; and the judge was entitled to conclude that Higgins supervised at least one other person, leading to a two-level enhancement and a sentence of 121…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Deborah Walton and Kenneth MarsalisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Willsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States v. Julius LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API