Legal Opinion
Cairns v. City of East Orange
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 29, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
267 N.J. Super. 395 (1993)
631 A.2d 978
NEIL CAIRNS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 15, 1993.
Decided September 29, 1993.
Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.
Barry H. Evenchick, argued the cause for appellant (of counsel and on the brief).
Rashidah N. Hasan of the firm of Lofton & Wolfe, argued the cause for respondent (of counsel and on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.
This case involves an application of the Workers' Compensation Act (Act) which is one of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Saunderlin v. E.I. Dupont Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Walck v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- George v. Great Eastern Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Stroka v. United AirlinesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Klein v. New York Times Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Prettyman v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997