Legal Opinion · Dissent

Makainai v. Goo Wan Hoy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1903Published

Motions roe Rehearing.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

GALBRAITH, J.

I concur in the order overruling the motion for rehearing for the reason that the grounds on which it is based are not well taken. However, I am convinced, on further investigation, tint •there was an error in the former judgment that the court of its own motion should correct.

I understand that there are some propositions developed in the construction of the War Revenue Act of 1898, and the earlier Acts of a similar character, that may now be said to 'c well established by judicial authority, namely, (1) that a note issued without a stamp; while that part of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Latham v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Grant v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Rheinstrom v. ConeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Cassidy v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1900
  5. Harvey v. WielandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API