Legal Opinion

Vays v. 139 Emerson Place

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered January 25, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint to add a proposed fourth cause of action for restitution/unjust enrichment, and otherwise denied the motion, and denied defendants-appellants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As is relevant to the instant motion and cross motion, the individual litigants, plaintiff Fred Vays and defendants George *481Dellapa and Elissa Winzelberg, are equal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Airco Alloys Division v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Najjar Industries, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Unisys Corp. v. Hercules Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Najjar Industries, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rossi Mktg. Group, Inc. v. Malin Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  2. Walsam 316 v. 316 Bowery Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API