Railkar v. Boll
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
MODIFIED OPINION ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING
Ashok Railkar filed suit for personal injuries against Janice Boll and recovered a trial judgment in the amount of $5,000. P. F. Collier, Inc., as Railkar’s employer, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., as the workmen’s compensation carrier, were given leave to intervene to protect the lien of workmen’s compensation paid to Railkar in the amount of $9,800.
Petitioner, Philip E. Howard, an attorney, had represented Railkar in the injury suit. He also represented Railkar in a prosecution of an appeal of that suit on the issue of damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moran v. KatsinasIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Manion v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Hardwick v. MunstermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Vandygriff v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Lewis v. Riverside HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Kimpling v. CantyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Dukes v. J.I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.