Legal Opinion

Railkar v. Boll

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1970No. Gen. 69-193PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

MODIFIED OPINION ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING

Ashok Railkar filed suit for personal injuries against Janice Boll and recovered a trial judgment in the amount of $5,000. P. F. Collier, Inc., as Railkar’s employer, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., as the workmen’s compensation carrier, were given leave to intervene to protect the lien of workmen’s compensation paid to Railkar in the amount of $9,800.

Petitioner, Philip E. Howard, an attorney, had represented Railkar in the injury suit. He also represented Railkar in a prosecution of an appeal of that suit on the issue of damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moran v. KatsinasIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Reno v. Maryland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Manion v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  4. Hardwick v. MunstermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Vandygriff v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Lewis v. Riverside HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Kimpling v. CantyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Dukes v. J.I. Case Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API