Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Industries, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2013Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, J.

These are tort actions—specifically, lawsuits based on damage to plaintiffs’ property by allegedly negligent construction—and are barred by the statute of limitations applicable to such cases, for the reasons explained in the last two paragraphs of the majority’s memorandum. The rest of the memorandum, which treats these cases as arising out of construction contracts and governed by the rule of City School Dist. of City of Newburgh v Stubbins & Assoc. (85 NY2d 535 [1995]), is a misapplication of the Newburgh rule.

Newburgh was an action by an owner against a builder for the defective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. City School District v. Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Macrose Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API