Legal Opinion

Cano v. Saul

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 15, 2020No. 1:19-cv-11563Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JOSELINE A. CANO, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-11563-ADB * ANDREW SAUL, * Commissioner of Social Security, * * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Plaintiff Joseline A. Cano (“Claimant”) brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) denying her claim for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API