Legal Opinion
Jain v. Clarendon America Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 9, 2004No. C03-2842PPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
PECHMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 17.) Having reviewed all of the pleadings and supplemental materials and having heard oral argument on the matter, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re mand. Defendants argue that the Plaintiffs’ (“the Jains”) state law contract and tort claims are really claims for indemnification of the Jains’ Section 16(b) liability under the Securities and Exchange Act (“the SEA” or “the Act”). According to Defendants, federal law bars indemnification for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Syndicate 1861, Subscribing to Policy No. ANV122398A v. DaileaderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Worldway International Investment Holdings Limited v. Advanced Bioenergy LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021