Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. City of North Bay Village
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided September 26, 2013No. Case No. 13-CV-20064PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PAUL C. HUCK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendants’, City of North Bay Village (“the City” or “North Bay Village”), Matthew Schwartz, James McVay, and Gustavo Cruz, Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint [D.E. Nos. 19, 27, 30, 44], Plaintiff, Mark Weinstein (‘Weinstein”), claims the defendants violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights while Weinstein was a police officer with the North Bay Village Police Department. Weinstein alleges that the defendants retaliated against him because he advocated to change the official union of the police…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Stenberg v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blackburn v. McPhailDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Jason Crawford v. Sheriff Bill Prummell, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Permon Thomas v. Florida Department of Education, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.