State v. Smithers
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Jeremy Smithers was convicted of nine drug related offenses including possession and distribution of methamphetamine. 1 He appeals contending that the trial court erred: 1) in allowing the State to present evidence of the discovery of methamphetamine in another county, when the test results of that evidence was not disclosed in discovery; and 2) in finding adequate evidence to corroborate accomplice testimony. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] Chad Blasius, an acquaintance of Jeremy Smithers, lived at a house in Madison, which is in Lake County, South Dakota.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ChaconWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SteckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CoreanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017