Legal Opinion

State v. Smithers

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Jeremy Smithers was convicted of nine drug related offenses including possession and distribution of methamphetamine. 1 He appeals contending that the trial court erred: 1) in allowing the State to present evidence of the discovery of methamphetamine in another county, when the test results of that evidence was not disclosed in discovery; and 2) in finding adequate evidence to corroborate accomplice testimony. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] Chad Blasius, an acquaintance of Jeremy Smithers, lived at a house in Madison, which is in Lake County, South Dakota.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ReutterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. ChaconWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. SteckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. CoreanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. KihegaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API