Legal Opinion

Sohman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtWadhams, J.

The amendment of the complaint by increasing the amount of damages claimed was granted at the close of the case after alLthe evidence was before the court. The argument was made in the absence of the jury, which had left the court room by direction of the presiding justice, and in accordance with his instructions no piention was made of the granting of such motion by counsel in summing up to the jury. Counsel for defendant pleaded surprise, and requested that a juror he withdrawn, and urged that the motion should be made at Special Term. There' could not be and there was no surprise on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Egan v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Zimmer v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Rhodes v. LewinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Edge v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Foley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
  3. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API