Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Reading-Sinram-Streat Coals, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalter A. Lynch, J.
The action is for a permanent injunction and other varied relief. Findings of fact and conclusions of law have been waived.
The first cause of action is directed against the defendants Iandoli and Beading-Sinram-Streat Coals, Inc., the last-men*294tioned party being hereafter referred to as Beading. Therein a decree is sought enjoining and restraining these defendants permanently from using the name Sinram in connection with the corporate name of defendant Reading in the fuel oil business in the metropolitan area of New York City or in the State of New York, and also for an accounting.
Sinram…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Lewis v. . GollnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Quaid v. RatkowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Quaid v. . RatkowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Reading-Sinram-Streat Coals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957