Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dang v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 6, 2003No. 14-00-00560-CRPublished

1DissentJ. Harvey Hudson, Justice

I join the majority in its disposition of appellant’s first four issues. In his fifth issue, however, appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion in limiting closing argument to twenty minutes. Because I agree with appellant, I respectfully dissent.

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” U.S. Const, amend. VI. “The Constitutional right of a defendant to be heard through counsel necessarily includes his *192right to have his counsel make a proper argument on the evidence and the applicable law in his…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Willie v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API