Legal Opinion

Donald Stephens, and v. John Thomas, Warden, and Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1994No. 93-2206, 93-2223PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The Warden of the State of New Mexico appeals the district court’s grant of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, to Mr. Stephens. The district court determined that Mr. Stephens’ good time credits were forfeited without procedural or substantive due process. Mr. Stephens cross-appeals challenging the district court’s rejection of his claims under the Equal Protection Clause and the Ex Post Facto Clause. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 2253 and we reverse.

Background

Mr. Stephens was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Raymond WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Josephine Brown v. Aristedes Zavaras, Robert FurlongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. United States v. CappsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API