Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramos

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 13, 2014No. 12-1801PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Zairo Ramos and three co-defendants were recorded on video engaging in sex acts with a fourteen-year-old girl. In defending at trial against a charge of aiding and abetting the production of child pornography, Ramos claimed unsuccessfully that he did not know the acts were being recorded. Invoking the insufficiency of the evidence, he presses that same argument on appeal, along with a claim that the trial judge deprived him of his right to call a key witness.

With respect to sentencing, Ramos contests the length of, and justification for, his prison term, and challenges…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Trinidad-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Padilla-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Encarnacion-RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Ramos-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Elliott DukeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API