Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Royal Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1919No. 9888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

.Action on insurance policy; from Tattnall superior court—Judge Sheppard. May 25, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

In order that the first headnote may be better understood, it may not be amiss to briefly state the salient facts of the case, and our reasons for the decision here made. G. R. Garnett, as ádministrator of the estate of J. U. Rowe, brought suit against the Royal Insurance Company Ltd., on an insurance policy issued by the defendant company in favor of Rowe, and subsequently transferred by him, with the consent and approval' of the insurance company, to Mrs. Della Easterling, and transferred by her to the plaintiff, for value, after the loss of the insured property. The defendant’s answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Sundry Ins. Cos.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Hughes v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forney v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Estate of Carroll G. Frye v. MMG Insurance CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. Estate v. MMG Ins. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API