Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Kane

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-6082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Bartle, District Judge.

Plaintiff are Frank Noonan (“Noonan”), Rahdy Feathers (“Feathers”), Richard A. Sheetz, Jr. (“Sheetz”), E. Marc Costanzo (“Costanzo”), and Frank Fina (“Fina”), four of whom are former high level employees of the Office of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania (“OAC”) and one of whom is a retired Commissioner of the Pennsylvania State Police. They have filed this action against: Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane (“Kane”); Michael Miletto (“Miletto”), an investigator for the Office of the Attorney General; the Philadelphia Daily News; one of its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. NOONAN v. KANEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API