Legal Opinion

Pitney v. Pitney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1940No. 34,659PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action for alimony and separate maintenance, claiming to be the common-law wife of the defendant. The trial court made findings of fact and gave judgment in plaintiff’s favor, and defendant has appealed.

*849The question presented upon the appeal is whether the findings of the court and the evidence contained in the record support the judgment of the court. The contested issue is whether there was in fact a common-law marriage between plaintiff and defendant. The general situation may be gleaned from the findings of fact…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Marsicano v. MarsicanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Schuchart v. SchuchartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Matney v. LinnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  5. Renfrow v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Schrader v. SchraderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Fleming v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API