Saul Subsidiary II Ltd. Partnership v. Venator Group Specialty, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
This appeal arises out of a commercial lease dispute between Saul Subsidiary II Limited Partnership (“Saul”), the landlord, and F.W. Woolworth Co. (‘Woolworth”), now known as Venator Group Specialty, Inc., the tenant. We are called upon to construe a provision of the lease that obligated Woolworth to pay stipulated rent in the event it vacated the demised premises. The case turns primarily on the meaning of the term “vacate.” The trial judge construed that term to mean the tenant’s physical act of ceasing operations in the premises cowpled with the expressed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. FelderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Garay v. LirianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Washington Automotive Co. v. 1828 L Street AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.