In Re the Trust Created Under Agreement With Lane
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
In this probate proceeding, appellants contest the district court’s determination that respondent was eligible to benefit from a testamentary trust. Appellants argue that the district court erred in (1) finding that respondent, whose mother was explicitly excluded from the trust, was a beneficiary of the trust by virtue of his adult adoption by his uncle and (2) denying the trustee’s petition to investigate the circumstances surrounding respondent’s adoption. We affirm.
FACTS
George B. Lane was the founder of a company that through a series of mergers became…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- In Re Trust Under Agreement With NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMANSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of KingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In the Matter of the Estate of: Rosalie S. Allard, Decedent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- McCampbell v. McCampbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020