Legal Opinion
In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1984No. C6-83-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Erwin J. Schmid and First Trust Company of St. Paul, the trustees, instituted this action by filing a petition for instructions as to the final distribution of the residuary trust created by the will of Robert Hartman (testator). Respondents, testator’s great grandchildren, sought a construction whereby they would receive the entire remainder of the trust estate to the exclusion of appellant, Karl Malischke. 1 Malischke argued that the language in question was not ambiguous, and, if followed, the trust estate would be shared by him and.the great grandchildren. The case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Trusteeship Created Under Will of OrdeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- In Re Estate of WorksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- In re Swenson's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- In Re Trust Under Will of CosgraveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- In Re Trust Created by Will of CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of Trust Created Under Agreement With McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re Trusts a & B Created Under the Last Will & Testament of DivineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Estate of ZagarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Matter of Estate of ArendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.