Legal Opinion

Schlumberger Limited v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1981No. Civ. 59904PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYBURN, J. *

Procedure

Schlumberger Limited, petitioner, petitioned this court for an alternative and peremptory writ of mandate or, in the. alternative, an alternative and peremptory writ of prohibition, directing the superior court, respondent, to vacate its order directing petitioner to produce documents and communications which petitioner contends are privi leged as either attorney-client communications or attorney work product. The petition was denied by this court. A petition for hearing was filed in the Supreme Court, and granted. The matter was retransferred to this court with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Roberts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dietz v. Meisenheimer & HerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Fischel & Kahn, Ltd. v. Van Straaten Gallery, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Montebello Rose Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Southern California Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API