Legal Opinion

Hamman v. Hayes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1965No. 6772PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is a suit in the form of a declaratory judgment brought to determine the legality of the appointment of the Director of Police for the City of Port Arthur. Plaintiff is the former Chief of Police, but brought this action as a taxpaying citizen against the City of Port Arthur, the Mayor and the Director of Police. Trial was before the court and judgment was one of dismissal for want of jurisdiction. The parties will be referred to as they were in the trial court.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether or not such action must be brought as a “quo warranto”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeithTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Williams v. CastlemanTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Terrell v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. McFarlin v. State Ex Rel. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Willborn v. DeansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Neeley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  2. State Ex Rel. McKie v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lewis v. Drake, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
  4. Norville v. Parnell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. Bean v. Town of VidorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API