Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1980No. 35663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bowles, Justice.

Certain beneficiaries under the will of Gordon Bennett filed suit against the executors praying that the court construe certain language of the testator’s will, to wit:

"I hereby will, bequeath and devise all the remainder of my property, both real and personal, of whatever kind and wherever situate, to my nieces and nephews, per stirpes. This is an individual gift to those nieces and nephews now in esse and is not a class gift.”

At the time of the execution of the will the testator had one brother deceased and one sister living neither of whom had any children; he had one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacGregor v. RouxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. In re the Estate of IvesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Camden Safe Deposit, C., Co. v. MacMullanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Last Will and Testament of LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. In Re the Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament & Codicils Thereto of WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Stewart v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Hack v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Rhodes v. First Alabama Bank, MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API