United States v. Kent Food Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether food condemned as adulterated in interstate commerce under the prohibition of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, § 304, 21 U.S.C.A. § 334, may be released to the owners for export to another country. The district court, in an endeavor to conserve food available for human consumption and relying upon a provision of the Act exempting food products intended for export, § 801(d), 21 U.S.C.A. § 381(d), held in favor of the claimant owners. The United States has appealed, contending that such action is beyond the court’s power.
Her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Norman M. Morris Corporation v. Hyman Weinstein, D/B/A Bright Star EnterpriseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Kanasco, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Articles of Hazardous SubstanceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. O. F. Bayer & Co. United States v. Savoy Tea & Coffee Co., Inc. United States v. Polin Bros., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Articles of Hazardous Substance, Etc., and Troxler Hosiery Co., Inc., United States of America v. Articles of Hazardous Substance, Etc., and Troxler Hosiery Co., Inc., in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.