Legal Opinion

The Silvia

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 22, 1924No. 5640PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This matter arises on exceptions to the commissioner’s report. The interlocutory decree held both parties in fault, and directed that the damage, when ascertained, be divided.

The exceptions taken by claimant arp twofold: One, that the commissioner erred in finding a total loss of the Gi'aney; the other, that the commissioner erred in including in the damage all that happened to the Graney after a certain period in the catastrophe.

The exception to the finding of a total loss is overruled. It seems to me that the facts show such total loss.

The exceptions based on the claim…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The" North Star"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. The M. E. LuckenbachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912
  4. The M. E. LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. The Asbury ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cenac Towing Company, Inc., Appellant-Appellee v. W. A. Richmond, Appellee-Appellant, W. A. Richmond v. Cenac Towing Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API