Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foraker v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 18, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

’WOODSON, J.

This is an original proceeding by mandamus brought in this court by the relator against the respondent, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Pettis County, to compel him to proceed with the trial of the case of W. E. F'oraker, administrator of the estate of James Starling Foraker, deceased", against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company, pending in the Circuit Court of Pettis County, .Missouri.

The facts out of which this case g’rew will best appear by a substantial statement of the petition filed by the relator asking for the writ of mandamus, and the respondent’s return thereto.

On…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Missouri Ex Rel. ForakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Fielder v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State ex rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Bright v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API