Legal Opinion
McCarter v. McKelvey
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 10, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions
On quo warranto. Demurrer to information.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief Justice.
These suits were instituted by the attorney-general for the 'purpose of testing the right of the several defendants therein to exercise the liberties, privileges and franchises of members of the board of fire and police commissioners, the board of finance, and the board of public works of the city of Paterson, under appointment by the mayor of that city, made'pursuant to the terms of three acts of the. legislature of this state passed in the year 1907, and constituting chapters 45, 46 and 62 of the laws of tliat year. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Rogers v. . Common Council of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Attorney General v. Board of CouncilmenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Barker v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- State ex rel. Owens v. FurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TausickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- MORTON v. Mayor & Council of Tp. of ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Attorney General Ex Rel. Connolly v. ReadingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Grosso v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.