Legal Opinion

Cusumano v. Griffith

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 11, 2019No. 4:17-cv-00291Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RICK CUSUMANO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:17 CV 291 JMB ) ANNE L. PRECYTHE,1 ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Rick Cusumano’s ("Petitioner") "Motion to Accept Supplement to 2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus" ("motion to amend") (ECF No. 19). Petitioner moves to supplement his pro se habeas corpus petition, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking relief from his January 4, 2011, conviction. In response to Petitioner’s motion, the State of Missouri ("State") argues…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API