Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Gruber

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 1, 1943No. 38430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, P. J.

Plaintiff, as purchaser, sues for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. At the time the contract was .made title to the land stood in the ñamé of Elizabeth Gruber, deceased and intestate, mother of defendants Walter and George Gruber, her only heirs. The’ controversy hinges on the interpretation of a provision of the contract which reads: “Parties of the first part [defendants, vendors] agree to deliver to party of the second part' [plaintiff, purchaser] an abstract showing good title' in Elizabeth Gruber, the deceased mother of grantors, Walter Gruber and George…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Wimer v. WagnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Henderson v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Whitsett v. Peoples National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Salmon v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Nixon v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Three-O-Three Investments, Inc. v. MoffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Bogad v. WachterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Staples v. O'REILLYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API