Boasberg v. Walker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Platt B. Walker, Jr., E. O. Pickier, Frank Y. Haven and Ezra North-field to recover $10,000 damages for alleged conspiracy in procuring the vacation of a certain alley. The substance of the complaint is. stated in the opinion. From an order, Brooks, J., sustaining, defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Appeal from an order sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiff’s, complaint.
The complaint alleges, in substance and effect, that on the dates and at the times therein named plaintiff was the owner of certain real property in the city of Minneapolis, the rear of which abutted upon a public alley; that he had erected a large tenement building thereon sufficient for occupancy by several families; that defendants Pickier, Haven, and Northfield are owners of property in the vicinity of that owned by plaintiff, abutting upon the same alley. The-complaint further alleges that, subsequent to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- State v. PaulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
- People v. MorphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Brody v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916