United States v. United Technologies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Fighter jet engines propel planes faster than the speed of sound, a sight that may be as exhilarating to watch as it must be to experience. Not so the procurement process for awarding contracts to make jet engines.
In the early 1980s, the Air Force set up a bidding process to make fighter jet engines. Attempting to win as many engine contracts as possible, United Technologies manipulated its cost estimates to convince the Air Force to award the company a large share of the work. After the Air Force discovered that United Technologies had played with its numbers,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allison Engine Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Joey L. Mitchell v. Glenn ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Wall v. Circle C Construction, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Miller v. Weston Educational, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Brent Berry v. Native American Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- United States v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.