Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brynhildur Thorgeirsdottir v. New York City Loft Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1990Published

1Dissent

Asch and Rubin, JJ.,

dissent in part in a memorandum by Rubin, J., as follows: At issue on this appeal is whether it is within the authority of respondent New York City Loft Board to promulgate regulations requiring that an owner file a record of the sale of improvements before the unit in an interim multiple dwelling (IMD) in which the improvements are situated may be rented at the market rate pursuant to the provisions of section 286 (6) of article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law (L 1982, ch 349, § 1 [Loft Law]).

Section 286 (6) of the Multiple Dwelling Law permits the tenant of a unit in an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Matter of Marburg v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Association of Commercial Property Owners, Inc. v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API