Crawford v. Cox Planing Mill & Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Associate Justice.
The trial court sustained appellees’ demurrers to the appellants’ amended complaint. On appeal the only issue is whether appellants ’ amended complaint stated a-cause of action under the doctrine of attractive nuisance.
The appellant alleged that the “minor” child [no age stated] was injured when he fell from an unguarded scaffold while playing the game of hide-and-seek on a Sunday afternoon in a construction area on public school grounds where no warning signs or barricades of any nature existed. The plaintiff’s complaint further stated:
“The unfinished walls of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Trust Co. v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Garrett v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Jones v. ComerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Foster v. LuskSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Schilz v. Walter Kassuba, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Mikkelson v. RisoviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968