Crow v. Crow

The presiding judge construed the verdict rendered by the jury in this case as meaning that they found for the plaintiff the sum of $275 on account of the rental of the land, and in favor of the holder of the fi. fa. for the sum of $374.74 on account of the amount due upon it, leaving a balance in favor of the holder of the fi. fa. of $99.74; and that the land should be sold, this balance should be paid, and the remainder of the proceeds be paid over to the plaintiff. The first two grounds of the amended motion for a new trial seek to attack the construction placed by the court upon the…