Micou v. Moses Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Montgomery. Heard before the Hon. JouN A. Fosteb.
1Opinion of the CourtSomeryille, J.
The present appeal is from an interlocutory order of the chancellor appointing a receiver, and made at the instance of the complainants, who are judgment creditors of B. IT. Micou. It fully appears that, upon this judgment, there had been issue of execution, with return of “Noprop-erty found;” and the- purpose of the bill is to reach an equitable interest of Micou, which he is alleged to own in certain crops raised in Montgomery county, in the year 1882, on a plantation carried on in the name of one Gf. R. Micou.
The practice is settled in this State, in accordance with the modern English…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. Administrator of BackusIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Ex parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Bloodgood v. ClarkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Briarfield Iron Works Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Randle v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashurst v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- C. E. Development Company v. KitchensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Moritz & Weil v. Miller, Schram & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Henry v. IdeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Freeman v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.