Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Faulkner
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 4, 1942No. 22006PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUCHAMP, Judge.
This proceeding, instituted originally in this court, is an attack upon Ordinance No. 85 of the City of Canyon, Texas, and upon Section 2 thereof, reading as follows :
"SECTION 2. NUISANCE TO MAKE UNINVITED CALLS AT RESIDENCE.
“The practice of going in and upon private residences in the City of Canyon, Texas, by solicitors, peddlers, hawkers, itinerant merchants, transient vendors of merchandise, not having been requested or invited to do so by the owner, or owners, occupant or occupants of said private residences, for the purpose of soliciting orders for the sale of goods,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte HoggCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Dubuisson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex Parte LuehrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Houston Credit Sales Co. v. City of TrinityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.