Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1931No. 12,417PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties are hereinafter respectively referred to as the Driscolls, the board, and the company.

The board sold state land to the Driscolls, reserving mineral rights, and thereafter; gave the company an oil and gas lease on the reserved estate. The board and the company brought this action to enjoin the Driscolls from interfering’ with the reserved estate and the rights of the lessee. By answer and cross-complaint the Driscolls claimed title in fee simple and demanded that same be quieted in them. G-eneral demurrers to this answer and cross-complaint were sustained. The Driscolls elected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walpole v. State Board of Land CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  2. Gunter v. WalpoleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Miller v. Limon National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farnik v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Archuleta v. GomezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. Farnik v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF COUNTY OF WELDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Graham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API