Legal Opinion

Heitkoetter v. Domm

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 29, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00368Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00368-NODJ-BAM 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED 14 KARL DOMM, COMPLAINT 15 Defendant. (Doc. 63) 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Karl Domm’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 19 Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) and Special Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Complaint. (Doc. 63.) 20 Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (“Plaintiffs”)…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API