Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Doe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided July 6, 2007No. 4274Published
1Opinion of the Court
374 S.C. 622 (2007)
649 S.E.2d 153
Ernest Lamar BRADLEY and Esther K. Bradley, Appellants,
v.
John DOE and AccuSweep, Inc., Respondents.
No. 4274.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Submitted May 9, 2007.
Decided July 6, 2007.
Rehearing Denied August 27, 2007.
Donald Higgins Howe and Walter Bilbro, Jr., of Charleston, for Appellants.
Margaret Helen Fanning, of Charleston, for Respondents.
ANDERSON, J.
Ernest Lamar Bradley (Bradley) appeals the trial court's decision granting John Doe (Doe) summary judgment on Bradley's claim for recovery under his uninsured motorist coverage.[1] Bradley (1) contends the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.