Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Naff
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket 5, Calendar 45,121PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cake, J..Plaintiffs instituted an action at law in the circuit court to recover damages for an alleged breach of a reciprocal racial restriction. The declaration filed alleged that they were the owners of lot 14 in City Heights subdivision embracing certain land in Highland Park, that the defendants were the owners of lot 15 adjoining plaintiffs’ property, and that prior to March 4, 1941, the owners of 75% of the frontage of lots on Tennyson avenue in said subdivision, in the block bounded on the east by John B. street and on the west by Woodward avenue, entered into an agreement affecting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Corrigan v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Conlin v. UptonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Barrows v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Spencer v. FLINT MEMORIAL PARK ASSN.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.