Legal Opinion
State v. Mobley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 17, 1951No. 73PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohNsoN, J.
Decision bere rests on the Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. In disposing of the appeal on that ground, these two questions are posed: (1) Was the defendant, in soliciting orders for photographs, engaged in interstate commerce? (2) If so, does the challenged statute place an undue or discriminatory burden upon such interstate commerce in violation of the Federal Constitution?
1. The question of whether the defendant was engaged in interstate commerce. — The defendant insists that in soliciting orders for photographs to be processed and manufactured in the State of Tennessee she was…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Olan Mills, Inc. of Ohio v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Commonwealth v. Olan Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Olan Mills, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- County Board of Arlington County v. Arcade-Sunshine Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.