Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Office of Administration
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) brought the above-captioned Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action seeking docu ments that CREW asserts Defendant, the Office of Administration (“OA”), a unit within the Executive Office of the President (“EOP”), assembled and prepared relating to the White House’s alleged loss of EOP email records. On June 16, 2008, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting OA’s motion to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Scott Armstrong, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Executive Office of the President, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- John Doe Company v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Loving v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Northwestern National Insurance v. Insco, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.