Legal Opinion

Sewell v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1980No. 10809, 10810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Chief Judge.

A vehicle driven by plaintiff Desiree Se-well, 19, collided with a vehicle driven by Joe Hale, an uninsured motorist. As a result of the collision Desiree sustained serious personal injuries and her parents sustained a derivative loss. Defendant MFA Insurance Company insured the Sewell vehicle. This action was brought by Desiree and her parents under the uninsured motorist’s provisions of the MFA policy. The jury awarded the three plaintiffs a total of $20,000. From the judgment entered on the verdict both sides appeal.

Hale himself was not a party to the action but the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Doisy v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Hawkins v. WhittenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Bowman v. HeffronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Cato v. ModglinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Krenski v. AubuchonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Stegan v. H. W. Freeman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bentley Ex Rel. Bentley v. CrewsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Jones v. FreeseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API