Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grimsley v. Nelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 9, 1996No. 35A95Published

1DissentJustice Frye

The majority holds the trial court correctly dismissed the case against Travelers Indemnity Company, plaintiffs’ uninsured motorist (UM) carrier, because service was improper against defendant Nelson (the tort-feasor). Therefore, the majority concludes that the Court of Appeals erred in deciding that the case could proceed against Travelers to determine whether plaintiffs were entitled to UM coverage. I do not believe that our case law and the statute call for the result reached by the majority. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Under the Motor Vehicle Safety and Financial Responsibility Act,

e…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Buchanan v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Spivey v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API