Stough v. Stefani
Nebraska Supreme Court
Eeeoe to tbe district court for Dixon county. Tried below before Ceawfoed J. cited: 2 Greenleaf Ev.,, §§ 636, 640. Aultman v. Reams, 9 Neb., 487. Carlisle v. Kinney,''(Ah Barb., 363. Salt Springs Bank v. Wheeler, 48 N. Y., 495. cited: Benj. .'Sales, § 701. Kein v. Tupper, 52 N. Y., 550. Parson’s Mercantile Law, 42, note 1.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff to recover the value of 1,188 railroad ties, which it is alleged he converted to his own use. Stough in his answer denies that Stefani was the owner of the ties in question; denies that he converted said ties to his own use; and denies that he does or did detain the same as alleged. There seems to be no conflict in the testimony as to the facts that Mr. Stough obtained the ties in question, *469and that they belonged to Stefani. These facts are substantially admitted.
The testimony tends to show that .in 1876…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Starr v. Bankers Union of WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Sullivan Co. v. WellsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
- Hill v. Campbell Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Ross Produce Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Johnson v. SamuelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.