State v. Bowman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. The defendants were indicted, tried and convicted of tlie crime of keeping and maintaining a liquor nuisance, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRotheock, J.
i. CRomiALiaw: mlsnomen: arraignment and piea. I. The indictment named one of the defendants as George M. Bowman. It appears from ^ie evidence that there are two Bowmans named George. One is an old man, and his name with the middle initial is George M. Bowman. The other is a young man, named George J. Bowman. It is evident from the testimony of the witnesses in the case that the young man was the one who sold part of the liquor, and was engaged in keeping the alleged nuisance. The record shows that the defendant John A. Bowman was arraigned aud pleaded not guilty; but it is silent as to an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Collins v. HillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Grousendorf v. HowatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. CorwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.