Legal Opinion

Murray v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 20, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00889Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PATRICIA MURRAY, Personal Representative of the Estate of JOESPH MURRAY and PATRICIA No. 3:18-cv-00889 (MPS) MURRAY, Surviving Spouse, Plaintiffs, v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL., Defendant. RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION This action by Plaintiff Patricia Murray (“Plaintiff”), in her individual capacity and as a representative of Joseph Murray’s estate, includes several product liability claims, a recklessness claim, and a loss of consortium claim, all of which stem from Mr. Murray’s alleged exposure to asbestos…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Kwan v. The Andalex Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 BEARGRAM Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API