Legal Opinion
Weddingfeld v. Gregersen
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,645PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This cause was before us on a former occasion. We reversed a judgment which had been granted to the plaintiff upon the pleadings. It was then a suit for specific performance of a contract concerning land. Gregersen v. Weddingfeld, 70 Colo. 494, 202 Pac. 709.
After remittitur was sent to the court below, plaintiff, by leave of court, filed an amended complaint. This new complaint set forth substantially the same facts contained in the original complaint. But instead of seeking specific performance, the prayer was for damages for the breach of contract.
A motion to strike was interposed on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
- Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Rohrbach v. HammillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Givens v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Thompson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Hoehne Ditch Co. v. John Flood Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Whittemore v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Farmers Life Insurance v. Ignacio State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.